New Zealand Gold Prospecting & Metal Detecting Forums Archive

 

The forum has moved to community.paydirt.co.nz, see you there!

This forum is now an archive to preserve the knowledge and finds posted here.

3 Pages<123>
nzpoohbear40  
Posted : Tuesday, 29 November 2011 9:59:47 PM(UTC)
nzpoohbear40

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,482
Man
New Zealand
Location: Matura

Thanks: 26 times
Was thanked: 384 time(s) in 329 post(s)
yes it is nice not to have tax in Alberta,...hahaha..it was great while i was living there for a year befor moving onto BC..
Chris - Fisher Dealer http://www.puiakisupply.co.nz/
rgmcbrid  
Posted : Tuesday, 29 November 2011 10:36:16 PM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
Greame,

So what you all are saying is that it would be best for the state to own and run the assets (in a thread that is complaining about the way the state is managing assets). It is a bit hard to follow the logic in that your are clearly unhappy with the way the government operates and have outlined many areas in which it could be improved, yet you still want to throw all the eggs in the basket and let the state look after it.

I will throw this out there; a principle of free market economics is that there is an alternative to everything. That is, there is more than one way to skin a cat. Many people’s default solution to every conceivable problem is to have the government ‘fix’ it. Invariably, this solution is the least effective and most expensive solution but is popular in that most people feel like it is going to cost someone else. I would say consider the alternatives before deciding on the least effective most expensive option.
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Tuesday, 29 November 2011 11:07:00 PM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Originally Posted by: rgmcbrid Go to Quoted Post
Greame,

So what you all are saying is that it would be best for the state to own and run the assets (in a thread that is complaining about the way the state is managing assets). It is a bit hard to follow the logic in that your are clearly unhappy with the way the government operates and have outlined many areas in which it could be improved, yet you still want to throw all the eggs in the basket and let the state look after it.

I will throw this out there; a principle of free market economics is that there is an alternative to everything. That is, there is more than one way to skin a cat. Many people’s default solution to every conceivable problem is to have the government ‘fix’ it. Invariably, this solution is the least effective and most expensive solution but is popular in that most people feel like it is going to cost someone else. I would say consider the alternatives before deciding on the least effective most expensive option.


Firstly may I say that the politicians elected by the people, to represent them in fact do NOT represent them at all but because we are to all intents and purposes banktrupt for lack of a more subtle word they follow the directions of those who do hold the purse strings.

You might find it a bit hard to follow my logic Robert but to be honest I find it impossible to follow yours unless of course you are on the side of those who hold the purse strings in which case your argument is to your benefit.

Private enterprise should NEVER own the utilities, communications and LAND which belong to the people because they can charge what they like and subjugate the people through oppression...its is clearly happening now - we were told that by privatising the assets of the people, state assets we would get a better deal through competition but it has not happened - the opposite has happened!

Why in fact are we selling assets? - To pay a debt which in my opinion has been paid for a hundred times over.

It may seem totally hypocritical of me saying that no one should own land and land should all be in the hands of the state for the people but if you wish to place the ownership of the land into the hands of a few then you will have given a very few select people the power of god over access and recreation within the domain that is currently State land. Already those who own Fee Simple land tenure can turn around and say "You Robert - I dont like the cut of your sails so clear off" and you have no rights to explore a tract of native bush, you have no rights to climb that mountain, you have no rights to fossick that creek, you have no rights to hunt that wide open space, you have no rights to ski that slope - your rights will have been taken from you and YOU will make the rich even richer by being forced to pay for access and if you cant pay you dont get access...have a look at what happened when Lilybank was sold to foreigners - Suharto of Indonesia...it will happen everywhere. Access to good honest New Zealanders was denied. The country will become a huge playground for the wealthy.

Now I really dont mind personally as I own my own tract of land, the only so called 'freehold' land in that particular mountain range - that means I can hunt to my hearts content, I can go tramping to my hearts content and I can go and do my hobbies and pastimes at my leisure but if what you advocate became law then few people indeed could do that. To be honest I dont think I should have the right to say yes or no to my fellow countrymen as I am only the guardian of the place for the duration and the place belongs to us all so that no one person has the say over another. We know that under the present system it doesnt work like that
I am bounded by around six other properties including the State land but mine is the only 'freehold' - fee simple in actual fact. Some of the others are leasehold. The only property which is next to me that you can legally access belongs to the State and administered by DOC - Do you really wish to destroy your right to access that land as well Robert - what you advocate will certainly do that for you.

As it is many land owners WILL allow access at the moment though it is getting harder as OSH and others bring in more stringent measures against land owners when things turn to custard - ie some silly ninny falls down a mine hole and you didnt warn them of the dangers of mineshafts therefore according to the system its YOUR fault!

As it is I allow all trampers access, some hunters and university parties or other research groups BUT if all NZ became private property and the OSH laws and liabilities become more obscene then you will just have to stay at home because there aint gonna be no where to go!

Sate ownership - politicians and managers of State departments to be paid by performance and efficiency - thats the only solution in my opinion.

Edited by user Wednesday, 30 November 2011 9:34:47 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

rgmcbrid  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 9:35:24 AM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
Greame,

Need to get some work done here, and will write more later but think about this; in New Zealand ‘the people’ live in Auckland. ‘The people’ do not like mining, hunting, grazing, timbering etc and are completely in favour of charging you to tramp around on their land.
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 9:59:21 AM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Originally Posted by: rgmcbrid Go to Quoted Post
Greame,

Need to get some work done here, and will write more later but think about this; in New Zealand ‘the people’ live in Auckland. ‘The people’ do not like mining, hunting, grazing, timbering etc and are completely in favour of charging you to tramp around on their land.


I have put a great deal of thought into this but it is not just from the mining perspective but rather taking into account many factors - all of which are being eroded AGAINST the wishes of most New Zealanders - to me freedom is the right to hunt, tramp, fossick, rock hounding, fishing and getting out into the wide open spaces - now those to whom you refer in Auckland have just as much to loose as I have - the right top camp, tramp, build a crib or bach, go for recreational fishing trips to great Barrier, sunbath on the beach - think about that one - a favourite Auckland pastime - Private ownership of the beach - hey I dont mind as I would do very well out of it thank you - in fact Robert the privatisation of land which i already have and beaches which I might get out of the deal is beginning to win me over!

Takiing in mind the manner in which the status quo voted it is quite apparent that most people are sucked in and apparently quite happy to get led down the garden path but those in Auckland have just as much to lose as you and I have. I have noted with surprise the number of Aucklanders on here who are keen on fossicking and getting out there and 'doing it'

Lets be honest about it - if land ownership leaves State hands then the Maori populace is going to be in head, hands and all and quite rightl so and settlements will have to be negotiated AGAIN with emphasis on the emerging serpent - the waterways and foreshore - and privatisation might see them handed over to Iwi - good one! That means that YOU pay to detect on the beach IF they let you at all!

Edited by user Wednesday, 30 November 2011 10:00:29 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

oroplata  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 10:22:55 AM(UTC)
oroplata

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered, Moderators
Joined: 16/06/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,040
Location: Christchurch

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 211 time(s) in 152 post(s)

I've always liked the idea of "personal responsibility zones" scattered throughout the country.

If you buy land in such a zone, you can do anything you want on it, as long as it isn't detrimental to anywhere else. (No poisoning the water etc). You can build anything you want on it without permits, BUT if if falls down and kills you and/or your family it's TOUGH SHIT. No insurance. No ACC. No dialing 111.

We also need to come up with a system that doesn't require economic growth to survive. Right now, if you stop growing your personal wealth, slowly but surely it will be destroyed by taxes and charges. With the upcoming collapse of the global capitalist system, something else need to be put in place. I guess gold/silver-based currency would at least provide a throttling effect.



Lammerlaw  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 10:41:23 AM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Originally Posted by: oroplata Go to Quoted Post

I've always liked the idea of "personal responsibility zones" scattered throughout the country.

If you buy land in such a zone, you can do anything you want on it, as long as it isn't detrimental to anywhere else. (No poisoning the water etc). You can build anything you want on it without permits, BUT if if falls down and kills you and/or your family it's TOUGH SHIT. No insurance. No ACC. No dialing 111.

We also need to come up with a system that doesn't require economic growth to survive. Right now, if you stop growing your personal wealth, slowly but surely it will be destroyed by taxes and charges. With the upcoming collapse of the global capitalist system, something else need to be put in place. I guess gold/silver-based currency would at least provide a throttling effect.


You might be right about gold and silver - at themoment it is good stuff to accumulate and I do note with interest that the US Government gold reserves have dwindled to a mere fraction of what they once were and the Federal reserves stock pile is growing - now that tells us something.
nzgold  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 6:29:24 PM(UTC)
nzgold

Rank: Gold Nugget

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 97
Location: New Zealand

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 20 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Hey guys, you both have some fair points. I tend to agree with Lammerlaw though. I agree with you one on thing though Robert, the state are extremely poor at their stewardship of our assets and money.
My point is, (and why I tend to agree with what Lammerlaw is saying)
Is that the SYSTEM needs changing.

By change I don't mean vote green, vote labour, but to completely detach from the corrupt and false monetary system which we are part of, that allows the rich bureacrats to rule our country.
The reason that there are rich and there are poor, There are politicians and there are serfs, is that some people do not understand how money is created.
Money is created out of NOTHING by a private institution and then lent to Govenments ( such as ours ) with interest charged on it.

Money is a game.

In this country, there are poor people. These people do not understand the rules of the game. Yet they continue to play it anyway. They don't know of or read the rulebook.
The middleclass, they know some of the rules, mostly learnt by trial and error. But they still don't understand the game
The rich know the rules. Knowing the rules of monopoly gives you a massive advantage over those who you are playing with does it not?

But the current rules are unfair, and corrupt. The problem is that nobody understands it. And those that do understand are rich. They run the country. There is no incentive for them to change the rules is there?

The system needs change. New Zealand needs to produce it's own legitimate and real currency. Backed by our gold.

How does this relate to stewardship and state ownership of assets? And stopping farces like DOC book removal from happening?

A massive overhaul would mean that there is a smaller gap between the law makers and working class. Which will mean that the people will be listened to ( more anyway) And there will be less cabbages like Hone Harawira, Key, Goff and Don Brash running our beautiful country.

Sorry about my ranting. I feel compelled to say something.
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 6:55:41 PM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
nz gold - totally agree and were you to put your words to me before presenting them I would not have changed one little bit of your statement.

The people of this country fail to understand the implications of the loans we took out to become the welfare state - loans under the terms of Fractional Reserve banking.

Agree entirely about monetary reform and agree entirely about being backed by gold - we have the gold but its going offshore and that must stop.

Political reform is well overdue in this country
GoldnNuggz  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 8:16:23 PM(UTC)
GoldnNuggz

Rank: Gold Flake

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 25
Man
New Zealand
Location: Christchurch

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Don't understand why we haven't created our own currency backed by Gold, how much Gold has gone out of NZ I wonder...?
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 8:35:45 PM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Originally Posted by: GoldnNuggz Go to Quoted Post
Don't understand why we haven't created our own currency backed by Gold, how much Gold has gone out of NZ I wonder...?


For starters everything from Macraes I understand except for the token, puny 1% or 2% 'royalty and Government gets!
GoldnNuggz  
Posted : Wednesday, 30 November 2011 8:49:10 PM(UTC)
GoldnNuggz

Rank: Gold Flake

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 25
Man
New Zealand
Location: Christchurch

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Lammerlaw Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: GoldnNuggz Go to Quoted Post
Don't understand why we haven't created our own currency backed by Gold, how much Gold has gone out of NZ I wonder...?


For starters everything from Macraes I understand except for the token, puny 1% or 2% 'royalty and Government gets!



And that's just for starters!
Its no surprise really, however unless you dig, how would you know that we have that much wealth in our own land going offshore!
That's a lot of Gold which we should (NZ) should own and use to OUR benefit, however after reading a bit, seems exactly what our Govt do not want... twisted!
rgmcbrid  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 12:22:29 PM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
Greame,

What you are proposing is to sort the government out and get them to manage the states assets the way you think they should be run, and I do not disagree with your objectives regarding the way state assets should be managed; however you need to consider that there are lot of other people/groups who are attempting to do the same thing and their ideas are a whole lot different than yours and mine. So unless you think the majority of the citizens share your views and you all have the most money to influence the government, you are not going to prevail. My guess is that you do not. Most people live in a big city and really don’t see any need for anyone to despoil nature by doing anything outdoors like digging or killing defenceless animals.

This is why as I said above the government is not really on your side, the governments objective is to grow and become ever more powerful, and to achieve this will pander to whoever makes the most noise and shells out the most money. So again I say the less the government owns/controls the better off the citizens are. The governments purpose should be to enforce the rules so that the people have a fair shake. Not that I am opposed to state owned land, I think it is a fantastic, but the more the government ‘manages’ it the less of a resource it becomes for the citizens. Again, less government is better government.

Also, it is not an ‘either or’ situation. If you look around the world land is not either state owned, or inaccessible private property. There are a lot of situations where large tracts of land are owned by timber or mining companies etc who let the public recreate on their land. There are also situations where the state leases land for that purpose. The benefit of this scenario is that the land is both productive, producing timber or whatever and paying taxes, and is still available for recreation.
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 2:10:00 PM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Robert

The government has one major objective - to stave off the inevitable by keeping its master, the offshore money lenders happy...it is THEM who run this company - to Quote Henry Ford "If the people of this country knew who was running it there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning!" or at least words to that effect.

This country is run by the dictates of the bankers - no more no less
At the second level the politicians piss in the pockets of the rich who in turn piss in the pockets of the politicians without actually realising that they have the most to lose...how ironic.
At the bottom come the people - hence forth called 'The Sheep' - blind ones at that!

I have just spend hours perving through 'Treasurenet' forums and I NOTE WELL the articles on the forum relating to ghost towns - Many are not accessible due to private ownership and subject to permission - Ah ha Robert is this what you advocate? - because that is what will happen. I noted the number of ghost town properties with Trespassers Prosecuted...or keep to the track and do not approach old buildings. Permission must be sought before visiting this town. Now I cannot give you specific towns the above relate to as I didnt expect to write this but you can see it for yourself and must indeed know the US better than I do.

I wonder who owns the land in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran etc - I really havent bothered to find out but I LOVE the lifestyle...yep would suit me fine...no restrictions like we have...who owns the land? State? Private individuals? Tribal?

I just fail to see your logic? If you compare the State owned land next to mine then there is one difference - I give permission to anyone to go tramping and I restrict it to go hunting to eight or so friends and as for gold fossicking - well thats another story.
The State land next door is open slather for hunting as long as you have a permit and that permit takes you anywhere within that conservancy, on State land for a set period - upwards of a year I think but stand to be corrected and you can go gallivanting around there to your hearts concerned. I am also fairly certain that if you were looking along rock shelves etc with a metal detector they would see that you were doing no harm but on my place its a different matter.

Now of course the government is NOT on my side - I have listed order of priorities above but private ownership is even LESS on my side unless it is ME doing the owning! I can sure in hell handle that part. I suggest you do some research to see how Suharto treated trampers, hunters and others who wanted to go on to Lilybank - that will happen here because the private ownership will become FOREIGN ownership...and their rules are not what you might expect as Suharto readily demonstrated.
It has got to the stage now where I could never, ever buy a place like mine again nor indeed my second rural property which is not as big because we are talking in terms of seven figures - not five anymore.

To summarize - the people of this country need to wake up, get rid of this system of government and bring in reform so that this country belongs to New Zealand again and is run for the citizens by a government who will not allow the dictates of the offshore bankers to take precedence, will declare the National Debt null and void as being paid off in accordance with what may be termed sufficient interest in keeping with the standard daily interest rates over the period and not under the rules of Fractional Reserve Banking. That all land become State property and open to all New Zealanders more or less as it once was and you Robert are not old enough to remember what it was like here BEFORE the offshore bankers began to dictate terms up to and immediately after WWII. There was no OSH - land owners allowed entry almost unrestricted although high country has always been mostly leasehold but they leaseholders did allow entry. Today land owners and leaseholders are scared to allow people on due to OSh laws etc - remember the kiddie in the shearing shed case? If all land was privatised it would be even worse than it is now.

I rest my case, I might even let you have the last say - but I am also aware that it is a Gold mining forum and not a political forum for left and right wing extremists. Should your ideas become the basis of the system you want then bring it on brother - bring it on - I own enough land to be more than happy and I have no restrictions on what I can do and I am number one to me!...its the rest of the populace who I would feel sorry for...but rest assured that when all State assets are privatised then you are in for a shock because FEE SIMPLE land - is your property Fee Simple? - will be annexed into state ownership to keep paying the offshore bankers and you will be paying a rent on what you currently own...sinister this privatising the state assets is dont you think...and in the end 'private' ownership will be in the hands of...you guessed it - the bankers!

Political statement and waffle session over - the final say is yours.

Edited by user Thursday, 1 December 2011 2:19:05 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

rgmcbrid  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 4:06:58 PM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
For my final say I will quote Albert Einstein.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
kiwikeith  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 5:46:22 PM(UTC)
kiwikeith

Rank: Gold Ingot

Medals: Outstanding Contribution: Helped organise get together for Paydirt members and volunteered gold claim for the event (Oct 2013)

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/06/2011(UTC)
Posts: 648
Location: hector

Thanks: 359 times
Was thanked: 230 time(s) in 154 post(s)
might as well put my 2 cents in
when i was selling my motels in arthurs pass i was requested not to sell to overseas people
but if they are the only ones who want to buy or have the money to buy why not dose one take the money and run

dont get me started on doc lived with them on my door step in arthurs pass for 5 years

here is a thought
if the goverment owned every thing , had control of it all , wouldnt that be "communism"
reds under the bed as i recall from the 60s
starflash  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 8:18:50 PM(UTC)
starflash

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 192
Man
Location: auckland, tairua

Thanks: 18 times
Was thanked: 38 time(s) in 30 post(s)
immmm kiwikeith

commies???, well capitalisim has never worked, the world is going through its god knows how many different version of it now, its a total failure and no matter how you look at capitalisim, it results in the tax payers or contributers being bank rupt due to the nasty word called inflation/growth. inflation is the flaw in capitalisim and is how govts can pay back debt. Does anyone know who the world bank is??? who are they?, they dont exist.

the answer is nationalism, its a form of capitalism but its not a free market version, its a version which is ideally suited to nz, ie, we are the best place to live in world, everyone wants to be here so make it really hard to get in and control our national assets, minerals, employing nzers and give the fingers to the rest of the world multi nationals. notice all the protests around the world? they are not radicals!

whoops had a few, might stay away from the keyboard
Lammerlaw  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 8:41:16 PM(UTC)
Lammerlaw

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,721

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 579 time(s) in 396 post(s)
Originally Posted by: kiwikeith Go to Quoted Post
might as well put my 2 cents in
when i was selling my motels in arthurs pass i was requested not to sell to overseas people
but if they are the only ones who want to buy or have the money to buy why not dose one take the money and run

dont get me started on doc lived with them on my door step in arthurs pass for 5 years

here is a thought
if the goverment owned every thing , had control of it all , wouldnt that be "communism"
reds under the bed as i recall from the 60s


Did you say Arthurs Pass? - second last time I drove through there was the middle of the night and some demonic skunk took my photo with an Orange flash and two weeks later I got a very official letter with a substantial account attached.

A few years ago now I had a girlfriend whos father owned the Otira Pub apparently and she wanted me to go spend Christmas with her at Daddies pub and then she wanted me to celebrate Christmas by doing nefarious thngs to her on the bar!!!

You will of course know Bealey - up on the hill behind Bealey Lodge or whatever it is called there are rows of trees planted - when the New Zealand Forest Service started those plantings, about the second or third year, in 1969 I put out the poles to do the planting so if the rows arent straight I might have to take credit! I didnt do the actual planting because I was on light duties - a week or so before hand I virtually ripped my nose off - today you cant tell or its hard to tell - a cobber and I had a race - I went the short cut because I thought I could see in the dark but I didnt see another friends car parked across the path and sort of went from light speed to zero instantaneously.
They were however great days planting at Bealey - I remember watching the deer running ahead of a helicopter I was in ferrying trees, the snow falling with big, slow falling flakes and the Keas. We stayed in the Canterbury University hut at Cass - apparently its a high faluting mansion now.
rgmcbrid  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 10:31:35 PM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
Quote:
well capitalisim has never worked


Ok, I am going to have to take the bait on this one; saying capitalism doesn’t work is like saying gravity doesn’t work because everything keeps falling down. The only trouble with capitalism it is that it works too well. Free market capitalism results in unparalleled innovation and efficiency. Nothing else comes even remotely close. The down side is that it is so efficient that eventually monopolies are formed and both producers and consumers are held hostage. In order for capitalism to be successful the government needs to pass and enforce laws to prevent a single entity from dominating a market. This is typically done by forcing companies that have become monopolies to split into two competing companies.

The reason the world is in an economic crisis is primarily a failure of socialism not capitalism. The general scenario has been that politicians promise social programs to get elected. These entitlements cost more than the government brings in, but the theory has been that as long as you keep expanding the tax base (by adding people) you can keep doling out more and more money that you don’t have because you are bringing in more and more all the time. In essence a ponzi scheme. Only a funny thing happens. People become so burdened with taxes and regulations and get so many handouts that they are less and less interested in actually working.

They also stop having children. I don’t think there is anywhere in Europe that has a native birth rate anywhere near their death rate. Many countries currently have a birth rate under 50%. But the state still needs money to fund all the social programs and greatly expanded governments so they bring in hordes of immigrants, which is why Europe is rapidly turning Muslim.

Eventually the spending gets so far ahead of the income that the country can no longer service the debt, which is where a lot of European countries and the United States are right now. The logical thing to do at this point is to print up heaps of money until it has been greatly devalued (inflation) and pay of the creditors with the worthless money. I fully expect this to happen in the United States.

Again, this does not mean capitalism does not work, it means socialism doesn’t work. And I am not saying this to be a jerk, but I have to assume you went to some fancy university to think otherwise.
oroplata  
Posted : Thursday, 1 December 2011 11:11:48 PM(UTC)
oroplata

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered, Moderators
Joined: 16/06/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,040
Location: Christchurch

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 211 time(s) in 152 post(s)

Well the reason for the economic collapse might be socialism, but it's not the socialism directed at the poor, it's the socialism directed at the big banks. :)

Too big to fail.



3 Pages<123>