New Zealand Gold Prospecting & Metal Detecting Forums Archive

 

The forum has moved to community.paydirt.co.nz, see you there!

This forum is now an archive to preserve the knowledge and finds posted here.

ted wilson  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 9:22:06 AM(UTC)
ted wilson

Rank: Gold Flake

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/01/2015(UTC)
Posts: 11
Man
New Zealand
Location: Live in Dallas, visiting son

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
This was buried in a longer post, so I though I would break it out.

If two people g gold panning, in a public area. They can each have a sluice. But can they set them up in a line, so one feeds the next one? I know I am streatching the rules, but want to stay legal.
rgmcbrid  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 9:39:03 AM(UTC)
rgmcbrid

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 583
Man
Location: Southland

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 180 time(s) in 140 post(s)
Again, I am no expert, but if you stick two sluices together I would call it one long sluice.
nafcd  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 12:36:48 PM(UTC)
nafcd

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 276
New Zealand
Location: ashburton

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 46 time(s) in 34 post(s)
why would you need to though. if its set up right one will catch it all. personally if you do need to put them in line I would class them as 2 sluices so legal but that's just my opinion.
LBD  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 12:54:16 PM(UTC)
LBD

Rank: Gold Ingot

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 101
Man
Laos
Location: PhuBia...for a change

Thanks: 22 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 33 post(s)
Originally Posted by: nafcd Go to Quoted Post
why would you need to though. if its set up right one will catch it all. .


Exactly... you would be better of having 2 side by side and put more dirt through them, than one after the other... inless you are chasing the ultimate recovery of flour gold...

Darren  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 5:01:30 PM(UTC)
Darren

Rank: Gold Flake

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/01/2014(UTC)
Posts: 24
New Zealand
Location: Blenheim

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 40 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Technically not a longtom, but why bother?

With more time in the field you will find you are running things pretty inefficient if you do it that way, what soaks up your time in these fossicking areas is the time it takes to dig pry and pull rocks to get the gravel which then needs to be classified, you are better off taking a couple of buckets then a couple of sluices, having one guy digging and classifying while the other feeds the classified material as quickly or slowly as the sluice can process it, swapping around and taking turns.

More equipment wont make you more gold in the time you are there, moving more dirt will.
ted wilson  
Posted : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 7:28:55 PM(UTC)
ted wilson

Rank: Gold Flake

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/01/2015(UTC)
Posts: 11
Man
New Zealand
Location: Live in Dallas, visiting son

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I build a "gold hog pan" while I was here. It does the classifying and initial concentration quickly. The two trips that I have done so far here, I simply took out the cons at that point and finished panned at home. (we had a 1 year old with us..... so were limited in what we cold do). It is a neat concept, google it if you have time.

I am looking forward to next year (with a two year old) and I would probably then bring over the gold hog matts that I have back in Dallas.

With the amount of water I saw at both sites I was at this week, it would be very easy to feed a length of lay flat about 50 feet upstream. This would feed a header box that feeds the sluices. You could feed this setup pretty fast. If you look at the "gold hog mini" you will see what I am thinking about.
I have a "Gold Hog Mini" back in Dallas, and have used it in Georgia at place where they bring in raw dirt, that you can load up into 5 gallon buckets and walk 30 feed down a hill to the stream. I loaded 4 buckets and put them in a wagon and took it to the stream. There you feed it into whatever you have. The amount of dirt you process is limited by how fast you can unload it at your equipment. I could feed a 5 gallon bucket into the mini in less than two minutes. The first trip I had to slow it down because I was overloading the matts. I added an extension and different matts in it. The total length is about 5.5 feet, just under 2 meters..... With the extension I could dump a 5 gallon bucket in less than 1 minute and not overload the overall system. I did find gold about half way down the extension, so it was worth having. I have 4 different matts that react to different conditions, so if one does not catch it, the next one will.

Anyhow since I have existing matts for about 5.5 feet of sluice, I would like to set them up back t back.

There is no way you can keep this system loaded, it will take to long to dig and fill the bucket than to process it at the box. (if you can dump it as quickly as I hope).

As you said, the key is to feed more dirt. If you can feed your sluice with a 5 gallon bucket in 2 minutes, you get back to digging quicker. If you are feeding at this rate, it is good to have a little longer run, so when you overload one section there is a clear section later to accept the material.

While you are digging, with the "active matts" like those at the gold hog site, they will clear up any matting that is overloaded by the time you get back to it with the next bucket load.


Anyhow that is what I am thinking about.

Edited by user Wednesday, 7 January 2015 8:14:10 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified