3 types of soil a VLF detector (like your 305) will struggle on are:
MineralisedAuckland's west coast beaches are an example of this, they contain a very high quantity of titanomagnetite (1/2 iron and other minerals mixed in). Some of it is from the Waitakere's but the majority has travelled up the coast from the New Plymouth area. This sand is magnetic and will overload a VLF detector - even a multi frequency one. Only a PI can punch through it since it's technology ignores mineralisation (a VLF needs to be ground balanced to remove it, but even automatic ground balancing can't balance to the extent needed).
FerrousAny iron in the ground, this includes the rusty halo in the surrounding soil / sand left after a piece of iron has rusted out. A multi frequency detector can be adjusted to ground balance this out but a large solid piece (i.e. man hole cover) will still overload the detector.
ConductiveAny non-metallic electrically conductive element. Saltwater at the beach is the classic example but overseas some areas also have problems with high fertilised areas. Multi Frequency detectors work best here because the processor can compare the ground signal from the different frequencies and balance the conductivity out (of course PI's as well because of their different method). Some single frequency detectors can also still work (like the AT Pro) but depth will suffer.
Thus the sand on the east coast beaches is mineralised, ferrous and conductive! A VLF's nightmare.
But finding black sand can be handy in certain circumstances. This sand is heavier then the normal white stuff and if a patch is found on the wet sand area of a beach not generally known for it, it means that some erosion may have occurred and the area should contain heavy targets (Gold!). In these spots minor amounts of black sand (Grey sand?) can be detected by ensuring proper ground balance and reducing sensitivity etc.
Edited by user Thursday, 14 February 2013 6:33:45 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified